So today
we have more images than ever but still a great deal of suspicion and lack of
understanding about how images “work” and
about their role in academia and elsewhere.
Let’s
switch modes for a minute and instead of talking about images in general,
let’s look at a few of the images from the
slide show because meaning and intent
are not always obvious…
and
we’ll discuss how different disciplines can add different perspectives to
looking at an image…
An
important distinction is “looking at/perceiving” vs. “interpreting”
•
•Let’s do some interpretation of an image from the
slide show- because meaning and intent are not always obvious…
•
•Starting with caption actually, not even image
yet:
•ASK how many know what “VJ” stands for
•not captioned “WWII Day” (tells us something about the times in which
it was taken)
•
•LIFE caption:
“Photographers across America captured victory kisses on August 14, 1945, the
day World War II came to an end. So why did
one embrace become a universal symbol of jubilation - and perhaps the most
reprinted image in LIFE's history? Having
spied a sailor smooching his way through Times Square, Alfred Eisenstaedt
followed until he found the perfect
composition - a confluence of lines and curves that draws the eye into a
vortex of pure joy.” --reads as an unambiguously happy event
•
•But look at the
rather strange positions of the two figures—the man appears to have his
girlfriend in a head lock—and her hand hangs lax,
not embracing him at all. We might use research from psychology and anthropological approached to human gesture and body language
interpretation to further analyze this image, as well as media theory issue
of gender expectations. Would this be a
canonical picture if the woman was dressed very differently, for instance?
•And just formally, what contribution did the black and white outfits have
on the aesthetic of this b&w photo?
•
•I wondered about the strange pose and did some research online.
Here’s what Eisenstaedt himself had to say about the image:
•
•“VJ Day in Times Square on August 15, 1945 provided the
opportunity for Eisenstaedt to photograph the image for which he is possibly most famous. "I saw a sailor
running along the street grabbing any and every girl in sight." he explained. "Whether she was a grandmother, stout,
thin, old, didn't make any difference. I was running ahead of him with my Leica looking back over my shoulder...Then
suddenly, in a flash, I saw something white being grabbed. I turned around and clicked the moment the sailor kissed the
nurse." Eisenstaedt was very gratified and pleased with this enduring image. "People tell me that when I am in
heaven they will remember this picture." “http://artscenecal.com/ArticlesFile/Archive/Articles1997/Articles0397/AEisenstaedt.html
•
Mores
of the times: So instead of say
boyfriend returning to girlfriend, this is an aggressive, really somewhat
weird, photo… today man would have been
slapped or had complaint filed against him instead of been made famous in this
picture…
Gender
issue: At the same time, there are tons
of pictures of French girls throwing themselves at the liberating American GIs marching in the streets of Paris. Even back
then, women kissing GIs seems less offensive (if at all) than the reverse…
Nationality
issue: Would this same image with
Eiffel tower in back have angered the French? Probably
SOURCES
_________________________
•1945: Alfred Eisenstaedthttp://www.life.com/Life/millennium/photos/eyerman.html