|
|
|
Most
disciplines, students create only in grad school
|
|
|
|
pedagogy of visually
based classes has traditionally been different. In many academic subjects-esp
early on, one learns things and proves that one learned them. (History, math,
etc.) Sometimes one gets to comment on others’ creativity, as in literary criticism,
but being creative in a field is usually reserved for advanced
courses—graduate school in fact. Message is often that only the gifted or
super smart can be creative in an areas, such as, say math or engineering or
history or biology… research is something u-grads are often not exposed to.
|
|
|
|
But in visual design
(broadly inclusive) one is creative from day 1. This is partially because you
need to experiment to learn—much cannot be taught directly—sort of like
riding a bike. Also, nature of fields different. Thus involving visual
thinking in other fields is not only to bring in a new methodology or avenue
of communication, but to actually bring in an unknown, a way of thinking that
cannot be pinned down and that requires a leap of faith in its execution that
text or math often does not. (esp at early levels).
|
|
|
|
Nature of field: not
so cumulative. A novice could make something as beautiful as a expert.
Probably not consistently, but even so—not like math where there’s virtually
no chance that you will prove an interesting theorem as a freshman, or, in
fact, do anything that hasn’t already been done. This is not the case as far
as visual design goes. On the other hand, much more subjective—someone may
say it’s great and another qualified person that it isn’t. Not like a math
problem that is right or wrong and can be graded by a machine. You cant grade
any visual art assignment by machine (at least not yet).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Art and
design—students create from day 1. In some ways CS more like studio class
then many humanities courses are (tell RISD story: comment on something
others have done or make your own work)
|
|
|
|
Can’t be directly
taught, have to do it to learn it—like riding bike.
|
|
|
|
Who knows what
bringing the visual digital literacy into other fields will do?
|
|
Possible that
bringing more visual thinking and communication, via computer graphics, into
more disciplines, will spur new creative thoughts.
|
|
|
|
|