•Is a system for investigating how meaning is
produced, doesn’t tell us what the
meaning is
•Doesn’t offer design guidelines or tools for image
creation
•Visual world may not follow linguistic model (difference between image and text)
–No way to determine which exact parts and relationships
of images constitute
“signs” (always subjective, always have polysemy—multiple meanings for any one sign)
–No end to layers of sign-signifieds (although endings
seem to happen naturally in
practice)
–visual signs may not all be merely conventions, as
claimed
•Conclusions drawn from single image or image-genre about larger gender or power relations can be misguided (e.g., women in advertising)
1.