Earlier this year, in an article for the Sheridan Center's Teaching Exchange, I quoted the Nobel Laureate Octavio Paz who, in 1967, wrote:
"The worship of the idea of technology involves a decline in the value of all other ideas."
Certainly one of the ideas, the value of which technology seems to address in sometimes hostile tones, is teaching. In this presentation I hope to insinuate that the worship of the idea of teaching doesn't involve a decline in the value of any other ideas, technology included, and that teachers will always do best to keeping their experiences and expertise in teaching firmly in mind when they consider the purposes and circumstances for/under which they would be interested in using computers in coursework.
One important cause of this cycle of failure has been top-down implementation of and enthusiasm about these technologies.
Writing about The Geographer's Craft in 1997, Ken Foote wrote:
"The Geographer's Craft is organized somewhat differently than other introductory courses in GIS. It is a two-semester, eight-credit course (GRG 859A and GRG 859B) comprised of lectures, discussions, labs, and small-group meetings. Its principal difference lies in the way students gain experience with geographical information systems, spatial analysis, cartography, remote sensing, and field methods. Rather than teaching these methods separately, the Geographer's Craft employs a problem-solving approach in which students learn these techniques, sometimes concurrently, as they address realistic research topics. The idea is to use engaging topics to teach broader lessons about how researchers and practitioners conceptualize theoretical and practical problems and then approach them with appropriate methodological tools. The real goal of each project is to sharpen the students' analytical reasoning abilities while building their proficiency in a variety of technical skills."
In Foote's project, and in many of the examples I've cited in this presentation one can see how a change in the organization and character of course materials and exercises, facilitated by technology, can lead to significant change in the experience of the course, for the teacher as well as the students. This is something we (at least at Brown) have known since the 1980s, when Bob Scholes, and Beeman, Heyward, et al at IRIS, wrote about their pioneering work in teaching with hypertext systems. It is perhaps the first thing to consider in deciding whether/when to use computers in your course.
© 2000 Roger B. Blumberg